This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 20th Century Studios, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 20th Century Studios and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.20th Century StudiosWikipedia:WikiProject 20th Century StudiosTemplate:WikiProject 20th Century Studios20th Century Studios
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
[[List of M*A*S*H characters#Frank Burns|Frank Burns]] The anchor (#Frank Burns) has been deleted.
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.
Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error
Near the end of the series run the network or studio or both promoted a national call in vote to keep the series or cancel it. As I recall the number of votes exceeded the number of votes in the presidential election. Cancel it won by about 10%. But I don't recall exact numbers. I think the "Keep it or cancel it vote" should be in the article.
2600:8807:5400:600:CD84:D8FE:E0CE:D008 (talk) 05:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's for entries that are disputed or are likely to be. Such a dispute in this case would be baseless. Squatters owning pages do that, and it's prohibited. But the only enforcement is by those with the time or funding to wear down editors with ceaseless baseless disputes. Nobody even tries to block people that constantly lodge baseless disputes which are eventually disposed of. That's why quality editors fled, the quality of wiki has declined, and nefarious political agents can post blatant politically motivated misinformation, and remove information they want to repress.
Why should you not require a source.? Who says this is not debateable? Only things that are obvious or undebatable don't require a source eg "The sun is in the sky" "Rain is wet". "Grass is green." "Humans rarely live beyond a hundred years" Etc. I believe that is Wiki policy.. It is not usually difficult to find a source for something important. Spinney Hill (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)Spinney Hill (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
